Send the magazine to someone who'd like to see Washington State as it's never been seen before
Current Issue
Past Issues - Review sample articles from past issues of Washington State Magazine
Photo Galleries - View photos of Washington's people and places--and more
Web Exclusives - Read exclusive features only available on the website
Buy books by WSU faculty and alumni.
Read reviews of books by faculty and alumns.
Class Notes - Stay up-to-date with fellow alumni and leave your own messages and announcements.
Make a tax-deductible gift to the Washington State Magazine Excellence Fund.
The latest word on WSU research.
Advertise to our 130,000 readers in Washington, the West and throughout the nation.
Let us know what you think.
Send address or personal info change.
Get Washington State Magazine at home.
Send the magazine to someone who'd like to see Washington State as it's never been seen before
 
Page 1 2 3 4 5
   
  Darwin was just the beginning: A sampler of evolutionary biology at WSU      

 


red-backed fairy-wren illustration

Illustration by Helen Fitzgerald

Who loves ya, baby?

Having more offspring than your competitors is the key to evolutionary success, but it’s not always easy to tell which adults produce which young. Although close observation can reveal who spends time with whom, recent advances in DNA profiling show that time together doesn’t always mean what we think it means. Take, for instance, a pair of songbirds working hard to feed their clamoring youngsters.

“The assumption up until a decade or so ago was that when you see a male and a female at a nest together raising young, that all the young in that nest belong to that male and female,” says Mike Webster. “And then somebody decided to test that genetically—and surprise, lo and behold, not all the young in that nest belong to those parents!”

It turns out that birds, long held up as models of dutiful monogamy, are in fact randy little rascals, and many bird societies are cauldrons of adulterous hanky-panky. Most kinds of birds engage in at least an occasional extra-pair mating. Some mate with others more often than with their partner. In the Australian fairy wrens Webster studies, nearly half—half—of all chicks are sired by a male other than their mother’s social mate.

Surprising as it was, that discovery helped explain something that has puzzled evolutionary biologists ever since Darwin—the bright plumage, dazzling songs, and flashy courtship displays so common among male birds. The puzzle was how birds could evolve traits that would make them more conspicuous to predators.

Webster says Darwin came up with the idea of “sexual selection,” a form of natural selection in which competition for mates drives the evolution of key features. If bright feathers and loud songs enable male birds to have enough offspring to make up for the greater risk of being eaten by a predator, those traits will evolve.

There was a problem with that idea, though. Most songbird males don’t seem to compete much for access to partners. In Webster’s wrens, some of the males have bright red or orange plumage; others are drab brown. Both kinds get a social mate without much fuss. So where is the sexual selection?

The discovery of extra-pair matings may have solved that puzzle. The males do compete—after they’ve found a social partner. And it is quite a competition, complete with offerings of flowers to the object of their desire.

“It’s a really beautiful display,” says Webster. “The males present flower petals to the females. They’ll pick a flower petal, and they’ll fly in and present it to the female. They fluff up their feathers, and they dance around. It’s just spectacular.”

Webster wants to understand the competition from the perspective of both the females and the males. Using observations of the adults and paternity tests on every chick in a population, he’s found that female fairy-wrens don’t mate with just any extra-pair male that comes along. Rather, they show a strong preference for more brightly colored males. Webster thinks a female accepts her first suitor as her social mate, regardless of what he looks like, just to get started on a family. Later she copulates with higher-quality males if her partner is not such hot stuff. Webster doesn’t know yet why females prefer the colorful males. Bright color may indicate better food-finding skills or better resistance to disease; or the preference may have arisen by chance.

For male wrens, stepping out seems more straightforward. Males who mate with more females sire more offspring and pass more of their genes on to the next generation. During one season, one male Webster’s group studied sired 15 chicks, 10 with females other than his social partner.

Extra-pair mating may also be a form of insurance for the males.

“If a male has all his eggs in one basket, so to speak, or all his young in just his social mate’s nest, and a predator gets that nest, he has zero reproductive success for that year,” Webster says. “From that perspective, I don’t think they care which female they mate with. They just want to get their young out in several nests.” And if flashy colors help them do that, there will be strong selective pressure to go for the glitz.


Page 1 2 3 4 5

Continued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. cupreata
In which we offer a variety of side trips into the realms of beetles, evolutionary developmental biology, systematics (how all living creatures are related to one another), species formation, sexual selection, and other fascinating places. Feel free to roam at will.
Continued.