Washington State Magazine

Washington State Magazine :: Fall 2013


Fall 2013

[+]
In This Issue...

Features

Water to the Promised Land :: As an aquifer declines, Columbia Basin farmers look to water promised them 80 years ago. by Tim Steury

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Map: Interactive map of the Columbia Basin Project }

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Background: The Columbia Basin Project’s past and present }

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Gallery: Irrigation Images of the Columbia Basin by Zach Mazur}

Booze, Sex, and Reality Check :: Student drinking may always be with us, but behavior modification could make it less risky. by Hannelore Sudermann

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Video: Booze, Sex, and Reality Checks demonstration }

If You Don’t Snooze, You Lose :: Chances are, you do not get enough sleep. And that could be dangerous. by Eric Sorensen

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Video: WSU Spokane’s Deadly Force Decision-making Simulator Bryan Vila at the WSU Sleep and Performance Center }

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Story: Fatigue at Sea: A Circumnavigator’s Story }

Panoramas

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Video: How to say “Go Cougs” in sign language }

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Gallery: A fitting business: Businesswoman and tailor Lucy Stevenson Photographs by Robert Hubner}

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Video: Soccer concussions }

Departments

:: First Words

:: Posts

:: Short subject: Constant coffee

:: Sports: Composing Cougar soccer

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Recipes: Sweet Corn }

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Story: The original story of Nature Boy }

Tracking

{ WEB EXCLUSIVE–Music: Compositions of Charles Argersinger }

New Media

Oceania and the Victorian Imagination: Where All Things Are Possible edited by Richard D. Fulton ’75 PhD and Peter H. Hoffenberg

Love Reports to Spring Training by Linda Kittell

Rugged Mercy: A Country Doctor in Idaho’s Sun Valley by Robert S. Wright

New & Noteworthy: Luna Sea by Kim Roberts ’82; The Boys From Ireland: An Irish Immigrant Family’s Involvement in the Civil War by Neil W. Moloney ’53; Biodesign Out for a Walk by Lowell Harrison Young ’72; Characterization of Biomaterials edited by Amit Bandyopadhyay and Susmita Bose

Cover: “Irrigation” by Mark Zack, acrylic on canvas, 2010.

Tracking

Eugene Rosa 1942–2013—Working for people and the planet

by | © Washington State University

When you fill out a career pushing the limits of knowledge, rising to “pioneer in your field” status, things are bound to get pretty technical.

Gene Rosa, environmental sociologist, lived that reality, penning papers with terms like “biosociology,” “post-normal risk,” and acronym-rich analytical tools like STIRPAT. In spite of the technical thickets of his work, say friends and colleagues, Rosa kept his eye on the increasingly threatened natural environment and the people in it.

“Gene was not just interested in the environment for its own sake, but rather he had a deep desire to see a better world, one with greater quality of life and well-being, and fewer environmental impacts,” says Kyle Knight, ’08 MA, ’12 PhD, a Rosa student and now assistant professor of sociology at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

Rosa died last February at 71, prompting an outpouring of praise for an influential scholar who deftly bridged the social, ecological, and physical sciences.

One of Rosa’s first publications, written with his Syracuse University doctoral advisor Allan Mazur, looked at reducing environmental demands without sacrificing people’s quality of life, says Knight. He returned to the topic repeatedly, writing several articles on ways to improve human well-being with a smaller environmental footprint.

Rosa also looked at the effect of modernization on the environment and the question of whether new technologies harm the environment or fix its problems.

“A common theme of Gene’s career was critiquing the techno-fix optimism,” says Richard York ’02 PhD, another Rosa student and collaborator who is now a sociology professor at the University of Oregon.

Rosa, he says, took the view that, “we as a society tend to overly conceive our problems as principally technical in nature when a lot of them really have social, political dimensions. So, it’s not so much the technology itself per se that creates problems or ameliorates problems. It’s how [it’s] used in a social context.”

In some situations, we not only lack the technology to fix problems, we lack the ability to see problems to begin with. Rosa gave voice to this in one of his favorite papers: “Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk.”

“Normal risk,” says York, involves things we can gather data about, like cigarette smoking or air travel. But there are other risks that we are trying to figure out in a scientific way, but can’t. They’re so new, we don’t have data on them, putting us into a gray area where science matters but lacks the information to make a clear answer. This is called “post-normal.”

“Recognizing those post-normal situations,” says York, “you really are in a case where experts do not necessarily have better judgment or better knowledge than lay people.”

Late in his career, Rosa led more than a dozen scientists in a piece for the journal Science urgingthe White House to make more room for public opinion in how it disposes of nuclear waste. The approach ran counter to the world of experts who will work to solve a problem in technical terms and view the public as an annoyance.

“Gene was saying we have to recognize those as political, social struggles,” says York, “and we have to take that into account as real phenomena and address them in social terms.”

Categories: Environmental studies, Sociology, WSU faculty | Tags: In memoriam

Comments are temporarily unavailable while we perform some maintenance to reduce spam messages. If you have comments about this article, please send them to us by email: wsm@wsu.edu